Posted by
Jason on Tuesday, January 08, 2008 6:40:46 PM
I'm a little tired of reading about "mindless" Evangelical Christians who showed up to the polls in Iowa to vote for Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR), simply because he is one of our own (he's even referred to now as "former pastor" rather than "former governor" in order to propogate that point of view). It's true that this may have been the deciding factor for some, just as I'm sure some Mormons showed up to vote for Romney. And the case can be made for immutable traits as well. Did some women vote Hillary just because she's a woman or did some African-Americans turn out for Obama simply because of the color of his skin? Probably.
My choice to support Huckabee came down, not to the identity of the messenger, but to the values he espoused. Though there are other fine men seeking the nomination, even Rush Limbaugh has said there is not a Reagan Conservative in the bunch. And since there was not the one candidate acceptable to all, different factions of the Republican coalition have settled on different candidates for legitimate reasons, and have ruled out others based on their respective priorities.
To Evangelicals, what is most important? Is it not that life begins at conception and is therefore worthy of protection and that the traditional family is a better institution for rearing children than the government? What other Republican candidate has proven himself trustworthy on these issues?
Gov. Romney (R-MA) may well desire to protect the family, but did not show the competence nor resolve to do so. Under his watch, Massachusetts became the first (and currently only) state in the union to allow gay marriage. Sure, it was an activist court that brought it about, but that's how it will happen at the national level as well. We're not impressed. And though he now claims to be "pro-life," Romney ran for governor as a blatantly pro-choice candidate and his current support of embryonic stem cell research and of delegating abortion regulations to the states cause us to question the sincerity of his timely "conversion."
Mayor Giuliani (R-NY) has never claimed to be an advocate of life nor of the traditional family.
Sen. Thompson (R-TN), though running on the most truly Conservative platform, has been "mailing it in" on the campaign trail. We want to know you're going to fight to win!
And Sen. McCain (R-AZ), despite a mostly pro-life voting record, opposes a marriage amendment to the Constitution which would define it as a union between one man and one woman.
We didn't mindlessly vote for Gov. Huckabee because he's Evangelical, but because he is the only candidate that shares our values on these vital issues. In the same way that economic Conservatives and national security Conservatives are not expected to betray their convictions for the sake of one candidate, why should social Conservatives be asked to do so, only to be maligned as "mindless" when we don't?
For this and other commentaries, please go to www.BoldColorConservative.com