About Me

Name: Jason
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Democrats Unhinged; Allies "Unnerved"

Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway... Before our very eyes, we are watching a rat race among the top Democrat presidential candidates to see who can make defeat in Iraq sound best.

Hilary got herself into a bit of trouble when Under-Secretary of Defense Eric Edelman sent her a letter this week saying that her call to "prepare plans for a phased redeployement" only serves to reinforce "enemy propaganda that the United States will abandon its allies in Iraq, much as we are perceived to have done in Vietnam, Lebanon, and Somalia."  The letter concludes that her position, "understandably unnerves the very same Iraqi allies we are asking to assume enormous personal risks."  Well said.

Hilary tattled to his boss, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, but didn't have much to say in the way of refuting Edelman's claims.  

Yet despite Hillary's valiant effort, the Ridiculocity of the Day still goes to Barack Obama, who said that the risk of genocide was not a good enough reason to keep American soldiers in Iraq.  Wow... Talk about "unnerving" our allies!


Articles to Reference:
1. "Obama: Don't Stay in Iraq Over Genocide"
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QGF5700&show_article=1&image=large

2. "Pentagon: Hill is Helping Foe"
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07202007/news/
nationalnews/pentagon__hill_is_helping_foe_
nationalnews_ian_bishop____post_correspondent.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Commanders' Pleas Fall on Defeated Ears

Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway...
"Bush is stubborn and he doesn't listen to his generals on the ground in Iraq."  It's a criticism we heard (ad nauseum) all throughout John Kerry's failed bid for the Presidency, and the Democrats continue to revive it from time to time whenever they want to get a sound bite on TV.

Personally, I've never really bought that argument, nor the one about Bush simply replacing the commanders with whom he disagrees.  Now the President has certainly replaced generals, but that actually quite common for a Commander-in-Chief to do during a war that's not going too well (i.e. Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War... good guys won that one, by the way).

But now Democrats are calling for a withdrawal from Iraq, despite pleas from commanders on the ground that the battle against al Qaeda is turning and that they need more time to finish the job started under General Petraeus (whom the Senate unanimously confirmed to the post back in January).  Yet the Dems continue unabated in their crusade for a precipitous departure, which would be an embarrassing defeat for the U.S., not to mention great recruiting propaganda for our enemies.

So who's really listening to the commanders in Iraq?


Articles to Reference:
1. "General Pleads for Time to Secure Iraq"
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QGD12O0&show_article=1

2. "John Kerry Urges Bush: Listen to Your Generals, Change Course in Iraq"
http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=5614

3.  "General Petraeus Confirmed 81-0 in the Senate"
http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92901
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (2) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Short Circuit Court of Appeals

Disclaimer:  I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway...  After sexually assaulting a 13-year old girl, Richard W. Thompson was sentenced to 10 years probation, even though he could have received up to 10 years in prison.  And Judge Kristine Cecava's rationale for such a lenient sentence?  She didn't think Thompson, who is only 5-feet-1-inch tall, would "do well in prison."

Attorney General Jon Bruning, rightfully suspecting that probation was far too light, immediately appealed the sentence.  However, the Nebraska Court of Appeals has, just today, upheld Cecava's soft sentence, ruling that even though she sighted his height, she had other "valid reasons" for going easy on him.

For instance, a clinical psychologist examined him and determined that he would not "reoffend" because a test he was given to him which indicated he is, "neither a pedophile nor a sexual predator."  I think that there's a certain 13-year-old Nebraska girl who might disagree with the psychologist's assessment.

So probation it is for this short, yet upstanding member of the Nebraska community.  My guess is that he's willing to put all this behind him, and he'll be out fraternizing with "ladies" his size again, sometime soon...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (4) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Best Suited for Prison Ministry

 Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway...
A $660 million settlement was reached this week between the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles and alleged victims of clergy sex abuse.  Cardinal Roger Mahoney, head of the L.A. Archdiocese had nothing to say during the hearing, but did offer an apology afterward, and said he would spend the rest of his day praying for those who were claiming to be abused.  I'm sure they all found that very comforting.

The bottom line here is that a lot of sex offenders (Priests) and their abettors (i.e. Mahoney) are getting off pretty easy here.  The $660 million is coming from the pockets of Catholic lay people, who have given faithfully to the church.  What penalty is there for the law-breaking Mahoney and his ilk?  None.  He walks out of the courtroom and goes to "pray" for the victims. 

But more importantly, the priests who abused their position in order to abuse children are walking free, and still sporting their clerical collars nonetheless!  These are men who are not suited to be ministering to people in a local parish.  They are better suited to prison ministry... as a fellow inmate.


Articles to Reference:
1.  "Judge OKs $660M Clergy Abuse Settlement"  http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jul17/0,4670,
ChurchAbuse,00.html


2.  "The Gospel vs. H.R. 4437"  http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/03/opinion/03fri1.html?ex=1299042000&en=4a4ce46ec2e0337d&ei=
5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Image Over Justice

Disclaimer... I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway...
Wow.  Michigan sure knows how to pick their public university presidents, don't they?  Last year, University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman said that she would enforce an admissions policy that gave preference to women and minorities, even after voters amended the state's constitution to disallow such preferences.  She would later be forced to comply, though the University is continuing to use the peoples' tax dollars to fight the peoples' will in court!  Amazing.

Now we read that the President of Eastern Michigan University, John Fallon, is being fired due to allegations that he and other school officials covered up the rape and murder of a student in order to "protect the school's image."  Now, we've read about a lot of ridiculocities coming out of liberal academia (see Duke "Rape" Case, Ward Churchill, etc. ad naseum), but this one really takes the cake.

Can you imagine the pain that her parents must being going through, having lost a child?  And in such a horrible manner?  Now multiply that by the added insult of a public institution of higher "education," to which you're paying a lot of money, trying to cover up that crime to protect their image!  It's insane!

The action against Mr. Fallon, and anyone else involved in this horrible scam, should not stop at simply losing their jobs.  There needs to be a legal investigation to find out if there was obstruction of justice or other crimes committed as they attempted to help a murder walk free for the sake of their precious image.

Perhaps the Michigan Board of Regents needs to be held accountable for the type of people they're putting in charge of their public institutions.

Articles to Reference:  "University President Fired for Alleged Cover-Up of Student's Rape, Slay" 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,289407,00.html  and "University of Michigan Drops Affirmative Action for Now"  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011002095.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gilmore's Out

Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy...

Here's what I think anyway...
I read over the weekend that Jim Gilmore has dropped his bid to be the GOP nominee for President.  Gilmore (former Governor of Virginia) seemed pretty solidly conservative to me, but in a crowded field, he couldn't really get his message out there.  Just a note to the 13 or 14 Gilmore supporters out there... I hope you'll consider supporting Fred Thompson...

Article to Reference: "First GOP Candidate Drops Out"  http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-briefs15.2jul15,1,6621671.story?track=rss
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nobel's Warriors

Disclaimer:  I'm just an average guy...

After beginning her rousing speech by asking the audience to "hug everyone around them," Nobel Prize winner Betty Williams of Ireland proved her merit for the prestigious award by saying she would like to kill George W. Bush... in a "non-violent" way, of course.

This is nothing new.  She said the same thing a year ago, except her audience was a group of school children.  There's a good lesson.  If you don't like the President's policy, you should want to kill him.  It shouldn't surprise us though.  Yassar Arafat is a Nobel laureate as well.

In other highlights from her speech, she said that President Bush has "acted unconstitutionally."  Like any Liberal making this charge (even Irish ones), she can't cite any specific Article or Section of the Constitution that's been violated.  I guess it's just easier to fool people that way. 

She also said, "The Muslim world is suffering beyond belief."  That, of course, is President Bush's fault, and not the warring Muslim sects (i.e. Sunni v. Shia or Fatah v. Hamas) running around blowing each other up, along with any civilians they can catch in the cross fire.

Then she added, "Unless the President of the United States is held responsible for what he's doing and what he has done, there's no one in the Muslim world who will for give him."  Right... and we all know how forgiving Muslims are once you apologize and give them what they want.  Just ask Israel.

And just to top it all off, Williams declared, "It's hard to be an American and go out into the world right now."  Because no one knows better how difficult it is to be an American than a Nobel Prize winner from Ireland...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

UNimpressed

 Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy with an above average interest in news and politics. But hey, here's what I think anyway...

What I think…
After Kofi Annan stepped down as Secretary General of the U.N., I thought his replacement (Ban Ki Moon of South Korea) might be the change the organization has sorely needed since, well, right after Annan was sworn in. However, Ban's recent editorial in the Washington Post, blaming the violence in Darfur on "man-made climate change," just proves that the U.N. elites will probably never get it. Do they really believe that the Islamists (or militant muslims, if you will) who are slaughtering people in Darfur would otherwise be peaceful, if it weren't for their deeply-held convictions about saving the environment?

The article illustrates the only policy the U.N. is determined to successfully implement: To continue to decline into a state of denial and irrelevance.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Would You Take a Child's Life to Save Your Own?

Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy with an above average interest in news and politics. But hey, here's what I think anyway...

What I think…
Well, in case you missed it, President Bush again vetoed a bill passed by congress to ease restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. This is the type which requires the destruction of a human embryo in order to extract certain types of cells which some scientists claim hold curative potential for many diseases. Well I, for one, would just like to say, "Thank you, Mr. President."

It has never been medically ethical to take one life in order to save another, and don't see how embryos, the most defenseless among us, have suddenly become the exception to that rule. In addition, the President (unfortunately) is not even outlawing the studies, but has only restricted federal tax dollars from being used to fund them. By the way, if this is such a promising science, why don't we let private industries and drug companies invest in them? The truth is that the private sector does not invest because they do not see the potential. If these cells could do what liberals are telling us they can do, then companies would be investing millions, if not billions, in them because the profits could be enormous! But they're not…

I think Tony Snow, the White House Press Secretary, said it best: "The President does not believe it's appropriate to put an end to human life for research purposes. That's a line he will not cross."

Amen.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Benevolence, Not Governance

Disclaimer: I'm just an average guy with an above average interest in news and politics. But hey, here's what I think anyway…

What I think…
Well I doubt you'll hear much about this from the mainstream media types, but Americans set a record last year by giving almost $300 BILLION to charity. That's almost a thousand bucks for every man, woman, and child in this country. I say we keep a good thing going. Why don't we cut taxes, get rid of all these unnecessary government handouts, and let the benevolence of the American people and private charities do the work in a much more efficient and loving manner.

Capitalism wins again...


Originally Posted June 27, 2007 at
http://www.myspace.com/lastplacelead
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »