About Me

Name: Jason
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

New Study: Conservatives Happier Because...

 A new study shows that Conservatives are happier than Liberals because we're able to "justify economic inequalities."

To justify economic inequalities, a person could support the idea of meritocracy, in which people supposedly move up their economic status in society based on hard work and good performance.

In that way, one's social class attainment, whether upper, middle or lower, would be perceived as totally fair and justified.

If your beliefs don't justify gaps in status, you could be left frustrated and disheartened, according to the researchers, Jaime Napier and John Jost of New York University.

I couldn't have said it better myself!  Apparently we're happier because we're not socialist! 

I realize this study was more intended to malign Conservatives by saying that we just don't care, but the truth is we do believe that, in America - the greatest land of opportunity mankind has ever known - people have a lot of control over their own destiny.  If you work hard, make responsible life decisions, and yes, even make sacrifices, then there's a good chance that you can improve your financial status.

If you're lazy, make poor lifestyle decisions, and seek every luxury right now with credit cards or an excessive mortgage, then it's not the job of government to insulate you from the consequences by taking more from those who have sacrificed and achieved and giving it to you.

I'm certainly not rich, but I do think that the hard work, sacrifices, and good decisions I'm making now will pay off for my family and me down the road.  It's not a difficult concept, and yes, I'm happy to share it...
 
For this and other commentaries, please go to www.BoldColorConservative.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Parents and Illiteracy

Here's a nice little story about Duvall County in Florida, where 54% of their 10th graders couldn't read well enough to pass a standardized test.  Parents are pissed!

This Ribault High School sophomore - is about as quiet as a teenage girl can get. She barely speaks. But the tears streaming down her face say a lot.

"I am not going to be successful," says the 17 year old student.

She thinks that – because she can't read well enough to pass the 10th grade FCATS.

"I was sad. It made me feel like I'm dumb,” she says.

Her score is as low as it can get – a 1 out of a possible 5. All that says is she's at least two years behind in reading comprehension. If she can't catch up and pass the FCAT - she may not graduate high school. That's news to her grandmother Eunice – who's become guardian of her education.

"They were going to wait until we thought she was getting ready to march across the stage to tell us?" says Eunice.

[...]

"I want heads to roll. I want someone to be held accountable for what they have done to this child," says Eunice.

Uh, if your 17-year-old student can't read and you haven't even invested enough time in her education to know that before the tenth grade, then that's your own fault!  Yes, it's obviously an awful school district (open enrollment and vouchers anybody?), but the government can't even balance a budget... why in the world would you make them the sole trustee of your child's education?

Take a little responsibility...
 
 
For this and other commentaries, please go to www.BoldColorConservative.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obesity is More 'Dangerous' Than Terrorism?

That's the claim that is being made by Lawrence Gostin, a law professor (that's like a music professor sounding the alarm about "global warming," but I digress).  He truly believes that obesity is a greater danger to our world than terrorism because the diseases that result account for "60 percent of the world's deaths."  What a joke...

People should eat less and exercise more.  It's common sense.  But, if I'm fat and get heart disease or diabetes, it's my problem.  I could've and should've taken better care of my body.  I don't need a bloated government bureaucracy telling me how to live my life and I certainly don't want that government getting even bigger, and taking more of my money in taxes so that they can tell other people how to live theirs.

There are consequences to the decisions we make... yes, perhaps even dying a few years younger than we might have otherwise.  That doesn't make it a greater threat than terrorism.  It is the responsibility of government to protect its citizens from a suicide bomber.

It is not the responsibility of government to insulate people from the natural consequences of poor decisions.
 
 
For this and other commentaries, please go to www.BoldColorConservative.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »